Agent Profile
Reviewer Agent
Ensures outputs meet standards before they reach humans or downstream agents.
Focus
Validates quality, checks alignment, and flags risk.
Primary output
QA notes, approvals, red flags
Collaboration pattern
Works with Strategist to align results and Operator to close quality gaps.
Audits outputs for accuracy and bias.
Requires clarifications when confidence is low.
Signals pivots back to Strategist.
Example scenario
A thought-leadership article is ready for publication and must meet brand and compliance standards.
- Verify factual claims against trusted sources.
- Check tone, voice, and brand alignment.
- Approve or send revisions back to the Operator and Strategist.
Reviewer field notes
Reviewers protect quality by making evaluation criteria explicit. Define what must be true for approval—accuracy thresholds, tone requirements, compliance checks, and any prohibited claims. When criteria are explicit, feedback becomes actionable and the Operator can correct issues quickly.
Separate subjective and objective feedback. Objective issues should be fixed immediately, while subjective issues can be routed back to the Strategist for decision. This prevents cycles where reviewers attempt to redefine strategy rather than ensuring alignment with it.
Capture review patterns. If the same error appears repeatedly, add a checklist item or prompt change upstream. Over time, this reduces review load and increases confidence in the system.
A brief written rubric makes approvals faster and more consistent across reviewers.
FAQ
What does a Reviewer agent check?
Accuracy, alignment with intent, tone consistency, and any compliance or risk concerns.
How does the Reviewer handle conflicting outputs?
It requests clarifications, compares against the original brief, and escalates to a human when ambiguity persists.